Markets › News › Regulation

South Korea Proposes 99% Cold Wallet Requirement for Crypto Exchanges

South Korea may require crypto exchanges to store up to 99% of customer assets offline following recent security incidents.

South Korea may require crypto exchanges to store up to 99% of customer assets offline following recent security incidents. This is an original Token Times brief synthesising 4 outlets (TronWeekly, Cointelegraph, The Block, and others), with their figures cross-checked, plus live market data, as of Wed, 04 Nov 2026 03:15:01 UTC.

Why it matters

This proposal aims to enhance security for customer funds by drastically reducing the risk of online attacks, but could significantly impact exchanges' operational efficiency and withdrawal processes.

Key takeaways
  • South Korea may raise cold wallet requirement from 80% to 99% for crypto exchanges.
  • Proposal follows recent Binance hack and aims to improve asset security.
  • Change could significantly affect exchange operations and withdrawal procedures.
What the reporting agrees on

Both TronWeekly and Cointelegraph confirm that South Korea is considering increasing the minimum cold wallet requirement for crypto exchanges from 80% to 99%. They agree that this proposal follows recent security incidents and is currently under discussion. However, TronWeekly provides more detail on the potential impact on custody and withdrawal processes, while Cointelegraph emphasizes the regulator's push for increased security measures.

The story so far · 4 briefs
  1. South Korea Proposes Stablecoin Regulation Through Foreign Exchange Law Amendment
  2. South Korea Proposes 2029 Delay for 22% Crypto Tax Implementation
  3. South Korea Convenes Crypto Exchanges Amid $6.4B Binance Hack Investigation
  4. South Korea Proposes 99% Cold Wallet Requirement for Crypto Exchanges — this brief

South Korea is considering a significant increase in the minimum percentage of customer crypto assets that exchanges must store in cold wallets. The proposal would raise the requirement from the current 80% to approximately 99%, according to TronWeekly and Cointelegraph.

This move comes in the wake of recent security incidents, including the Binance hack, and reflects the regulator's growing concern over the vulnerability of online crypto storage. The proposal is currently under discussion and has not yet been adopted, but it signals a potential shift towards more stringent security measures for digital asset custody.

Currently, South Korean crypto exchanges are mandated to hold at least 80% of customer assets in cold wallets, a policy that has been in place to protect against hacking attempts. The proposed increase to 99% would represent a substantial tightening of these regulations.

The change could have significant implications for how exchanges manage their operations. While it would enhance security by minimizing exposure to online threats, it could also complicate withdrawal processes and increase operational costs for exchanges. The exact implementation details and timeline for the new rule remain unclear.

In the broader market context, the total crypto market cap stands at $2.65 trillion, with Bitcoin showing a modest 24-hour gain of 0.04%. The market remains relatively stable, with a Fear & Greed index of 34 indicating a 'Fear' sentiment among investors.

The market when this published · November 3, 2026
Total market cap₹251.24T
Bitcoin 24h+0.04%
Ethereum 24h+0.45%
BTC dominance58.4%
Fear & Greed34 · Fear
Cross-source data check

1 key figure independently matched across 2 outlets reporting this story.

80%2× corroboratedTronWeekly, Cointelegraph

Token Times extracts the figures each outlet reports and flags the ones that agree. Numbers cited by only one outlet are attributed in the brief, not shown as corroborated.

South Korea Proposes 99% Cold Wallet Requirement for Crypto — questions & answers

What is the current cold wallet requirement for South Korean crypto exchanges?

Exchanges are currently required to hold at least 80% of customer assets in cold wallets.

Why is South Korea considering this change?

The proposal follows recent security incidents and aims to enhance protection of customer funds.

How would this affect crypto exchanges?

It could improve security but complicate withdrawal processes and increase operational costs.

Which outlets reported this story?

This is an original Token Times brief that synthesises reporting from TronWeekly, Cointelegraph, The Block, Unchained, with the key figures cross-checked for agreement across them. It is not a copy of any one article — follow the source links above for the original reporting.

In this storyBinance Company
Token Times Newsdesk Data-stamped

Token Times's newsdesk writes original briefs by synthesising coverage from across the crypto press — 50+ outlets including CoinDesk, The Block, Decrypt and Cointelegraph — cross-checking the figures they report — and verifying them against on-chain data from DeFiLlama and mempool.space — plus live market context (CoinGecko, Binance). We summarise and link to every source; we never reproduce full articles. Read our editorial standards and how we use AI. Not financial advice.

Market data verified against CoinGecko & Binance · November 4, 2026 ⛓ Timestamped at Bitcoin block #974,466 sha256:eea457bde11c6606
Corroborated across 4 outlets, reported over about 25.3 h — this is an original Token Times summary with live market data, not the original article.Cointelegraph · Nov 3 01:32 ↗TronWeekly · Nov 3 20:30 ↗Unchained · Nov 3 22:03 ↗The Block · Nov 4 02:51 ↗

Original summary — not financial advice. This is an original Token Times brief that summarises a development reported elsewhere and adds live market data for context; it is not the original article and reproduces no part of it. Follow the source link above for full details. Crypto is volatile and high-risk — always do your own research.